|
|
 |
to
content of issue |
|
Title |
ABOUT SOME PROBLEMS OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF
ELECTRONIC INTERACTION |
|
Authors |
Volchinskaya Elena, Ph. D., chief specialist of
the Legislative and methodical Department of the
Federal notary chamber, an associate Professor of
Department of theory of law and comparative law
research University «Higher school of Economics».
Russia, 127006 Moscow, Dolgorukovskaya ul., D. 15,
pp. 4-5. E-mail: evolchiskaya@notariat.ru |
|
Section |
LEGAL
REGULATION OF INFORMATION SECURITY |
|
Issue |
18 |
Page |
31–41 |
index UDC |
342.95 |
index LBC |
|
|
Abstract |
The article presents the results of analysis of
Russian legislation and law enforcement practice
related to electronic interaction. Researched rules
of civil and information the law governing
electronic communication. Indicated some issues of
theoretical and practical nature, including:
insufficient development of the theory of law of
electronic interaction, against which the
development of normative documents is “the lead”;
identification of the subject of the electronic
communication; establishing terms of equivalence of
documents on paper and electronic documents;
evaluation of parties ‘ consent as to the means of
electronic interaction, including the application of
customs of business turnover; reasons for not
allowing a license in the form of an electronic
document, as provided by the Federal law “On
licensing of certain activities” and others. Some
suggestions are made for improving the legislation
and practice of its application in the
implementation of electronic interaction. |
|
Keywords |
cluding: insufficient development of the theory of
law of electronic interaction, against which the
development of normative documents is “the lead”;
identification of the subject of the electronic
communication; establishing terms of equivalence of
documents on paper and electronic documents;
evaluation of parties ‘ consent as to the means of
electronic interaction, including the application of
customs of business turnover; reasons for not
allowing a license in the form of an electronic
document, as provided by the Federal law “On
licensing of certain activities” and others. Some
suggestions are made for improving the legislation
and practice of its application in the
implementation of electronic interaction. |
|
 |
You can access full text version of
the article |
|
|
to
content of issue |
|
